Testamentary capacity refers to a person’s ability to create a valid will. This ability deals both with being of legal age to create a will (18) and the mental capacity of the person making the will. Undue Influence occurs when a person acts under the influence of another rather than of their own free will […]
The post Effects of Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence on Wills appeared first on Dallas Probate Attorneys.
Venue refers to the court in which a proceeding takes place. A party may want to transfer venue for a number of reasons including convenience, type of court, or possibly because the original venue lacks the jurisdiction/ability to hear the case. A person’s domicile is their permanent place of residence. How is domicile established? When […]
The post Venue Transfer vs. Domicile appeared first on San Antonio Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
A holographic will is a handwritten will that is not witnessed. The testator, the person who made the will, must write, date, and sign the entire will. This type of will is valid in any state, including the state of Texas. However, as with most wills, it must be proven to be your will and not a forgery before it can become effective. But must the will be entirely in the testator’s handwriting? This case gives us some help in answering that question.
A will entirely written and signed by a testator, used as an alternative to a will drafted by an attorney.
In re Estate of Capps, 154 S.W.2d 242, 245 (Tex. App. – Texarkana 2005)
After Nadine Capp’s passing, her physical will was unable to be found. The trial court found that Ms. Capp (Decedent) had intended for her property to be dispersed as instructed by the will document, and admitted it to probate as a holographic will. The trial court also appointed Devon Roberts as the administrator for Decedent’s estate.
Truman Bishop (temporary administrator of Decedent’s estate) and Hulene B. Parvar appealed, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the admission of the will to probate considering the original will had not been found. They also declared that the evidence was insufficient regarding the proper execution of the will, and that the appointment of Roberts rather than Bishop was an error. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment, holding that the evidence was sufficient to allow for the will’s admission to probate (specifically that it showed the cause of nonproduction and that the will had not been revoked). The evidence provided showcased that the will had been created in Decedent’s handwriting and that the choice of administrator for Decedent’s estate was proper.
What evidence must be provided to show non revocation (the rebuttal of the presumption of revocation) of a lost will?
Proof of circumstances contrary to the presumption of revocation, or evidence that the will was fraudulently destroyed by another person, can defend against the invalidation of a lost will. Using the standard sufficiency analysis rule, the testimony of a person (witness) who states that a testator did not revoke the will has been held sufficient evidence of non revocation to support probate of the will. Additionally, evidence that shows a decedent recognized a will following its execution and had no issues with its intended beneficiaries or the will’s contents can be used to rebut the presumption of revocation of a missing original will.
In re Estate of Capps shows that a holographic will can/will be regarded as valid if either the will is completely in the testator’s handwriting (self-proven) or two witnesses testify to the presence of the testator’s handwriting. A will, intended to be holographic, will be enforced despite the existence of words not in the testator’s handwriting if those words do not alter the meaning of the will.
Do you need help with a probate matter in Austin-metro area or the surrounding communities? We are experienced probate attorneys who represent clients with sensitive probate matters. If so, please give us a call us at 512-273-7444 or use the contact form to the right (–>) to see how we can help.
A handwritten will is called holographic because it is written entirely in the handwriting of the person who made it. This type of will is typically made when someone doesn’t have time to go to a lawyer or make a more formal will, such as a last will and testament or a simple will.
A holographic will is one made entirely in the handwriting of the testator. Holographic wills are legal in Texas. A holographic will begins with the words “I, (name), being of sound mind, hereby…” You must make it clear that the document is your will. You must also sign and date it.
To make a holographic will, you simply write out your wishes. You can also have at least two disinterested witnesses sign it to “prove” that you actually wrote it. In other words, they certify that they saw you write it.
A holographic will is a handwritten will that is entirely in the handwriting of the testator, the person who is making the will. The will does not have to be in cursive, but it does have to be in the testator’s own handwriting.
A simple will is a will that is executed by a lawyer or notary in accordance with the formalities of the law. A holographic will is a will that is entirely handwritten, dated and signed by the testator.
In order for a handwritten will to be legal, the document must be in your own handwriting. No one can write it for you and it cannot be typed. You can write in cursive or print, but the entire will must be in your handwriting only.
The post Can a Holographic Will Be In Someone Else’s Handwriting? appeared first on Austin Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
A McLennan County judge will not dismiss the 2003 handwritten will of Texas music legend Billy Joe Shaver, which purportedly leaves his estate to his nephew. The nephew of another country music legend, Willie Nelson, originally made the request to throw out the will. Tommy Witherspoon of KWTX reports the following: The ruling by County […]
The post Judge denies request to throw out country music icon’s handwritten will appeared first on Dallas Probate Attorneys.
What’s the Difference Between an Estate Plan and a Living Trust? If you’re planning for the future of your estate, you may be wondering what the difference is between an estate plan and a living trust. Some people believe they are the same thing. But the truth is they aren’t. There is a significant difference […]
The post Estate Plan vs. Living Trust: What’s the Difference? appeared first on San Antonio Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
You might think that as long as you have a will, your estate will be distributed the way you want it to be. But if you don’t have a valid will in Texas, your estate will be distributed according to the laws of intestacy. It’s established law in Texas that valid will must be In writing, signed by a testator in person, and signed by at least two witnesses in the presence of the testator who are both over the age of 14. But what does it mean to “sign” a will? A new Texas case holds that simply initialing the will could be good enough to meet the execution requirement.
Attested will: requires the signature of the testator and the signature of two or more witnesses who are not beneficiaries of the will.
Jones v. Jones (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] March 29, 2022, no pet. history).
Decedent’s wife (Beneficiary) filed an application for probate of an attested will, which was contested by Decedent’s son from a previous marriage (Contestant). The trial court denied Testator’s application, declaring that the will lacked Decedent’s signature and that the statements from the witnesses regarding their viewing of the signing could not be correct.
Beneficiary appealed, and the Court of Appeals held that there was sufficient evidence to establish testamentary intent through (1) the presence of his initials on six pages of the will and (2) the statements made by the witnesses. The lack of a signature on the last page alone did not invalidate the will. The Court of Appeals referenced Texas case law suggesting that a signature on a will could be relatively informal (including initials) if testamentary intent was present. This intent could be inferred through the facts and circumstances surrounding the execution of the will.
Except as otherwise provided by law, a valid will must be: (1) In writing; (2) signed by a testator in person; and (3) signed by at least two witnesses in the presence of the testator who are both over the age of 14.
Jones v. Jones shows that, as long as there is testamentary intent present, initials may constitute a signature for the purposes of a will.
Do you need help with a probate matter in Austin-metro area or the surrounding communities? We are experienced probate attorneys who represent clients with sensitive probate matters. If so, please give us a call us at 512-273-7444 or use the contact form to the right (–>) to see how we can help.
A valid Texas will must be: (1) written; (2) signed in person by the testator; and (3) signed by at least two witnesses in the presence of the testator who are both over the age of 14.
A handwritten will is only legal if it meets the requirements of the Texas Estates Code. If the will does not meet these requirements, it may be declared invalid by a court. If any part of a holographic will is not in the handwriting of the testator, or if there is no indication of when it was executed, then it may be declared invalid by a court.
A will must be written and signed by the testator (the person making the will). Under Texas law, a will is not valid unless it was signed at the end of the document by the testator in what is called “testamentary capacity.” To have testamentary capacity, a person must: – understand that they are making a will – know the nature and extent of their property – know who their natural heirs are – understand how distributing their property will affect said heirs.
The will must be signed by two persons who witnessed and signed the will in the presence of the testator. A will can be revoked only if it is done in writing and signed by the testator at the end of the document or after another provision or clause.
If any of these elements are missing, then the court may find that the will is invalid.
In general, if you lost your original will, you can execute a new will to replace it. However, when you execute a replacement will, there are a few important rules that you must follow. For more detailed information, please contact our probate attorneys.
After a decedent’s will has been filed with the Court the Clerk of the Court should then publish a notice advising all interested parties that the Will has been filed. The notice must remain posted for at least 10 days. This is to give those who wish to contest a will time do so. If no one contests the will, the courts will move forward with confirming its validity.
The post Is It Good Enough to Initial a Will in Texas? appeared first on Austin Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
Funeral Costs & Last Expenses Paying for the Last Expenses Planning the funeral of a loved one can be very stressful. When a person dies, there will be a question as to how and when their funeral and last expenses are to be paid. Even if there is a will, unless the decedent is survived […]
The post Funerals, Burials, and Final Costs appeared first on Dallas Probate Attorneys.
Probate is the process of administering a deceased person’s property and assets in accordance with their estate plan. At times, this can lead to disputes over the ownership and distribution of their assets. The court may be called upon to adjudicate these disputes and determine the rightful owner of property in an estate. In doing […]
The post Can the District Court Determine Property Ownership of an Estate? appeared first on San Antonio Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
An insurance claim file can be attorney-client privileged. The attorney-client privilege is a legal principle that protects communications between attorneys and their clients from being disclosed in court. The insurance claim file is sometimes considered to be part of the attorney-client relationship if it contains confidential information about the case. The following case gives us more information:
Writ of Mandamus: an order from a court for a governmental entity to conform to their legal obligations
Humphreys v. Caldwell, 888 S.W.2d 469, 470 (Tex. 1994)
Jill Mullinax and Charlotte Farley had an automobile accident in 1991. Mullinax had State Farm insurance and was represented by Danny Humphreys and Harlan Holiner, both of whom served as claim adjusters. Farley sued Mullinax, and the case was settled prior to trial. At the same time, while this suit was pending, Farley filed another suit alleging that State Farm Humphreys, and Holiner engaged in bad faith and unfair settlement practices under Article 21.21 of the Texas Insurance Code. In response, State Farm filed a motion for summary judgment (arguing she lacked standing), which was denied.
Regarding this second case, during the discovery period, Farley asked State Farm to produce documents that State Farm declared to be privileged. These documents included the file on the car accident, information on similar claims over a five year period, and Humphreys and Holiner’s personnel files. Farley filed a motion to compel the documents, which State Farm responded to with affidavits with grounds for the exclusion of the documents. After several hearings, the trial court ordered State Farm to produce the claims file, the personnel files, and information about similar claims over the last three years.
The Supreme Court held that (1) State Farm’s affidavits were insufficient, and (2) The trial court abused its discretion in instructing the delivery of the entire claims file (the contents are attorney work product), and that an appeal by State Farm would not sufficiently remedy the situation. The Supreme Court granted State Farm’s motion for leave to file and granted the writ of mandamus conditionally, stating that the writ was only to be issued if the trial court failed to discard its claims file order/didn’t review whether work product privilege needed to be honored.
They must specifically plead immunity and provide evidence, such as affidavits or live testimony, that supports the claim. An affidavit which does not positively and unqualifiedly represent the facts as disclosed in the affidavit to be true and within the affiant’s personal knowledge is legally insufficient.
They likely contained the attorney’s mental processes, conclusions or legal theories related to their pretrial preparation.
Humphreys v. Caldwell shows that evidence conveying information that likely involves attorney-client privilege is subjected to higher scrutiny, and that the exclusion of such evidence requires sufficient support.
Do you need help with a probate matter in Austin-metro area or the surrounding communities? We are experienced probate attorneys who represent clients with sensitive probate matters. If so, please give us a call us at 512-982-9293 or use the contact form on the right to see how we can help. –>
In the world of insurance, there is a lot of back and forth between insurer and insured. But what happens when that communication is privileged? Can an insurance claim file be attorney-client privileged? When an insurance claim involves an attorney, that claim may be considered privileged.
Any material that is subject to attorney-client privilege will be marked explicitly in the file. Any material that is subject to attorney-client privilege is usually marked as “Attorney Client Privileged.”
Most insurance policies contain a confidentiality clause that protects the insurer’s trade secrets. However, this does not mean that the information in an insurance claim file is automatically attorney-client privileged.
No, an insurance policy is not considered confidential. However, an insurance claim file may be attorney-client privileged if it contains attorney work product.
The attorney-client privilege is one of the oldest and most well-recognized privileges in the law. It is based on the principle that communications between lawyers and their clients should be confidential. The attorney-client privilege protects communications between lawyers and their clients from being disclosed without the client’s consent.
Some states consider communications between insurance firms and their policyholders privileged, which means they are not subject to discovery in a lawsuit. In other words, if you’re involved in a car accident, your insurance company can’t be forced to turn over emails or letters that you sent them.
The post Can an Insurance Claim File Be Attorney-Client Privileged? appeared first on Austin Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.