Can someone bring a lawsuit regarding personal injury, death, or property damage in a probate court? Let’s look at the case of Gonzalez v. Reliant Energy Co. to find out. Legal Terminology Anti-suit Injunction A remedy issued by a court in one jurisdiction that prohibits a litigant from initiating or continuing litigation in another jurisdiction. […]
The post Can Probate Court Be the Proper Venue for a Personal Injury Case? appeared first on San Antonio Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
If you are involved in a probate matter in Texas, it is important to be aware of the restricted appeal process. This process can limit your ability to challenge certain decisions made by the court, so it is important to understand how it works before you find yourself in that situation. This case helps shed some light on the restricted appeals process.
Service of Citation: legal notice of the filing of the case to the opposing party.
Restricted Appeal: an appeal of specific aspects of a judgment rather than the judgment in its entirety.
Rule 21 & Rule 21(a), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure: states that any amended pleading must be served on an answering party.
Presumption of Revocation: when a will was last known to be in the decedent’s possession and cannot be located after death, a rebuttable presumption of revocation arises.
In re Estate of Wilson, 252 S.W.3d 708, 2008 Tex. App. — Texarkana (2008, no pet.)
Shelli Kay Wilson (Testatrix) filed an application to probate a will and have letters testamentary issued on December 20, 2006. Testatrix and Leslie Wayne Wilson (Decedent) had drafted the will using internet forms. After Decedent’s death, the original will could not be found. Brett Lee Wilson (Appellant) received service of citation on December 23, 3006. On January 3, 2006, Testatrix filed an amended application for probate. Shortly afterwards, the trial court held a hearing and admitted a copy of the will to probate. Appellant did not appear at the hearing, nor did he file a timely contest. Testatrix also testified at the hearing that Appellant had no intention to oppose the application. However, on March 22, 2007, Appellant filed a motion for new trial and an opposition to the probate of the will. Appellant stated that the motion was timely and met the requirements of Rule 306(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
After the trial court denied Contestant’s motion, he appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case back to the trial court. The Court held that: (1) Testatrix was not required inform Contestant of her amended petition to probate the will; (2) the presumption of revocation had not been rebutted through legally sufficient evidence; and (3) the appropriate remedy was not to render judgment, but to reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.
For the first issue, the Court stated that Rule 21 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (which Appellant argued applied to probate proceedings) did not apply to will contests. Therefore, Testatrix was not required to notify Appellant that the application had been amended. For the second issue, the Court determined that the evidence provided (namely an affidavit submitted by Testatrix) was not enough to rebut the presumption because it did not explain why the original will could not be located. For the third issue, the Court stated the decision not to render judgment was proper because Appellant requested a remand in his brief and the facts were not fully developed (since there was no contest to the will’s probate).
Does a restricted appeal offer the same scope of review as an ordinary appeal?
Yes, such an appeal gives an appellant a review of the entire case. The sole restriction is that the error must be visible within the record. Documents within the record include all papers on file in the appeal, the statement of facts, and the reporter’s record. This means that evidence not provided to the trial court prior to the final judgment may not be included.
What are the requirements of a restricted appeal?
An appellant must show that: (1) within six months of the judgment being issued, they filed notice of the restricted appeal; (2) they were a party to the underlying lawsuit; (3) they did not participate in the hearing that led to the judgment at issue and did not file any post-judgment motions or requests findings of facts or legal conclusions; and (4) the error is reflected within the record.
How can the presumption of revocation be overcome?
This presumption can be overcome through: (1) proof and circumstances suggesting that the testator did not intend to revoke the will or (2) evidence that another person fraudulently destroyed the will. In addition, recognition of a will’s continued validity and the testator’s continued affection for the chief beneficiary under the will (without the existence of evidence showing that the decedent was dissatisfied/wanted to change the will) can rebut the presumption of revocation of a missing original will.
In re Estate of Wilson shows that, when an appellate court upholds a legally sufficiency issue, the proper remedy is to reverse and remand the case back to the lower court.
Do you need help with a probate matter in Austin-metro area or the surrounding communities? We are experienced probate attorneys who represent clients with sensitive probate matters. If so, please give us a call us at (512) 273-7444 or use the contact form below to see how we can help.
If you lose an appeal in a Texas probate matter, you may be able to file a restricted appeal. A restricted appeal is a type of appeal that is available only in certain circumstances. You must meet all of the requirements for a restricted appeal, and you must file your appeal within the time limit set by law. If you do not meet all of the requirements or if you miss the deadline, you will not be able to file a restricted appeal.
If you’re not happy with a court decision in your probate case, you can file an appeal. Here’s how:
1. Talk to your lawyer. You’ll need to file a notice of appeal and other paperwork with the court, and you’ll need to do it within a specific time frame. Your lawyer can help you with this.
2. File a notice of appeal. You’ll need to file this with the court that made the decision you’re appealing, and you’ll need to do it within 30 days of the court’s decision.
3. Serve notice on the other parties. Once you’ve filed your notice of appeal, you’ll need to serve copies on all the other parties in the case. You can do this by mailing them or delivering them in person.
4. Submit your briefs. You and the other parties will need to submit written arguments, or “briefs,” to the appeals court. The court will then decide whether to hear your case and issue a ruling.
If you are not happy with the decision made by the probate court, you have the right to file an appeal. In order to do so, you must first file a notice of appeal with the probate court. The notice must be filed within 30 days after the date of the final judgment or order that you are appealing. Once the notice is filed, the court will set a briefing schedule and oral arguments will be scheduled.
If you are unsure of how to file an appeal or what grounds you may have for an appeal, you should speak with an experienced probate attorney. An attorney can help you determine if you have a valid basis for an appeal and can assist you in navigating the appellate process.
Appealing a case in Texas probate matters can be a difficult process, but there are some tips that can make it easier.
First, it is important to understand the grounds for appeal. An appellate court will only consider errors that were made in the lower court proceedings. This means that you cannot raise new issues or arguments on appeal.
Second, it is important to know the deadlines for filing an appeal. In most cases, you must file your notice of appeal within 30 days of the final order or judgment from the lower court.
Third, it is helpful to have an experienced attorney to assist you with the appeals process. Appellate attorneys know the ins and outs of the appeals process and can help you navigate it successfully.
If you’ve been named as an executor or administrator in a Texas probate proceeding, and the will is being contested, you may be wondering what a notice of appeal is.
A notice of appeal is a formal document filed with the court that starts the appeals process. It lets the court know that you (as the executor or administrator) intend to challenge the ruling.
The appeals process can be complex and time-consuming, so it’s important to understand all of your options and legal rights before moving forward. An experienced probate attorney can help you navigate the process and ensure that your rights are protected.
The post Restricted Appeals in Texas Probate Matters appeared first on Austin Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
When someone dies with a will in Texas, the court will follow the instructions in the will to distribute the deceased person’s assets. However, if there are any questions about the will or if anyone challenges it, the court may get involved to make sure that the assets are distributed according to Texas probate law. […]
The post Who Gets What under Texas Probate Laws If Someone Dies with a Will? appeared first on Dallas Probate Attorneys.
Can You Be Released from Liability in an Independent Administration? If you’ve been named as the independent administrator of a Texas probate estate, you may be wondering if you can be released from liability. The answer depends on a number of factors, including the size and complexity of the estate, and whether or not there […]
The post Can You Be Released from Liability in an Independent Administration Texas Probate Matter? appeared first on San Antonio Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
Amount in controversy simply refers to the amount of money that is being disputed in a case. Courts may have limits on the amount of controversy that they can hear disputes over. For example, a smaller county court may only be able to hear cases where the amounts in controversy range from $200 to $20,000. If a case has an amount in controversy that exceeds that limit, the case would have to move up to a larger court. How does the amount in controversy affect the jurisdiction (ability) of a court when the case deals with matters of probate? Furthermore, how do we know if a court has jurisdiction to hear a probate case in general? Hailey v. Siglar answers these questions.
Hailey v. Siglar, 194 S.W.3d 74 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. filed).
In October 2002, Cecillia Siglar transferred approximately $100,000.00 of her father’s assets from his account to hers. Cecillia maintains that her father authorized the transfer. In November 2002, Mr. Siglar executed a general power of attorney appointing Cecillia as attorney-in-fact. After Mr. Siglar passed away, his son, Ricky, began probate proceedings in August 2003 Angelina County Court. Ricky was appointed independent executor in those proceedings meaning he had the responsibility of making sure his father’s assets were dispersed properly.
On December 2, 2003, Ricky filed a petition in the Judicial District Court of Angelina County to recover the funds that were transferred from Cecilia’s mother’s, Otha Siglar’s, account to Cecillia’s. Cecillia filed an answer, but did not appear at trial. The trial testimony consisted primarily of Ricky’s testimony regarding events that occurred in the final months of Mr. Siglar’s life. On February 14, 2005, the district court ordered Cecillia to pay $96,250.57 to the estate and $1,500.00 in attorney’s fees. Cecilia appealed arguing that the court did not have proper jurisdiction to hear the case and that the case should have been dealt with in a county court rather than a district court.
One of Ricky’s arguments was that the amount in controversy of the case gave the district court jurisdiction to hear the case because it was $100,000 which exceeded the monetary limits of amounts in controversy of a county court. The court of appeals held that amount in controversy does not bear any weight of the jurisdiction of a county court in probate matters. The court of Appeals further stated that the district court never obtained jurisdiction in this case and therefore their judgment on the case is void.
Although the amount in controversy of this case was $100,000 and the county court could only hear cases with amounts in controversy between $500 and $50,000, this number has no bearing on whether or not the county court could hear the case. The reason the amount in controversy is irrelevant is because that range of $500-$50,000 only applies to civil cases. The Angelina County Courts had been specifically given probate jurisdiction by the Texas Supreme Court. Because they have specific probate jurisdiction they are able to hear any probate cases that are brought to them, and because this was a case involving probate matters, the amount in controversy restrictions could not be applied to the amount in controversy of $100,000.
As a general rule under the Texas Constitution, jurisdiction in probate cases belongs to the county courts. Article 5 section 8 of the Texas Constitution says that the district court shall have “exclusive, appellate, and original jurisdiction of all actions, proceedings, and remedies, except in cases where exclusive, appellate, or original jurisdiction may be conferred by this Constitution or other law on some other court, tribunal, or administrative body.” This means essentially that a district court can hear all matters unless that matter has been specifically designated to a different court. Here, the matter of probate had been specifically designated to the county courts in Angelina County, therefore, the district court in Angelina County could not hear the case. It was found that the amount in controversy could not be applied because the county courts’ restrictions on amount in controversy only applied to civil cases not probate, and the county courts had been specifically designated the power to hear probate cases.
The court recognized the confused state of the law of jurisdiction at that time and recommended: “We suggest that the Legislature look seriously at the complicated and overlapping trial court jurisdictional requirements in this state and enact reforms to make jurisdictional requirements uniform and understandable.” Hailey at 82.
If you are going through the probate process in Austin, you may be wondering if you need to hire an experienced probate attorney. There are many benefits to hiring an attorney to help with the process. An attorney can help ensure that all paperwork is filed correctly and can represent you in court if necessary. They can also offer guidance and support throughout the entire process. If you are considering hiring an attorney, be sure to do your research and choose someone who has experience with probate in Austin. Probate is all we do. Call us TODAY at (512) 273-7444for a FREE attorney consultation.
Probate court is a court that handles the legal process of administering the estate of a deceased person, including the person’s will and any trusts they may have created. In Texas, probate courts are called “district courts.” The probate process can be complicated, and it is advisable to seek the advice of an attorney if you are named as an executor or administrator of an estate.
If you are named in someone’s will as an executor, or if the person dies without a will, you may have to go to court to settle the estate. This is called probate court.
Probate is the legal process of settling an estate after someone dies. The court supervises the distribution of the deceased person’s assets to their heirs or beneficiaries.
If the deceased person left a will, the court will appoint an executor to carry out the wishes of the deceased. If there is no will, the court will appoint an administrator to manage the estate.
The probate process can be complicated and time-consuming. It is important to hire an experienced attorney to help you navigate through this process.
A probate judge is a judicial officer who presides over probate court proceedings. In Texas, probate courts are county courts that have jurisdiction over matters related to the estate of a deceased person, including the issuance of letters testamentary or of administration and the probate of wills. The probate judge also has jurisdiction over matters involving trusts, guardianships, and conservatorships.
A probate case is a court proceeding in which a will is proved to be valid or invalid. If the will is found to be valid, the court will appoint an executor to carry out the deceased person’s wishes. If the will is invalid, the court will appoint a administrator to manage the estate.
Probate court is the court that deals with the estate of a deceased person. In Texas, the probate court has jurisdiction over the following matters:
If you have questions about any of these matters, you should contact an experienced Texas probate attorney for help.
The post Civil and Probate Jurisdiction in Texas appeared first on Austin Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
Introduction The writ of mandamus is a judicial mandate issued by a higher court to force a lower court or government official to perform their duties. This is not an order issued by the Supreme Court, but rather can be issued by any other court that has jurisdiction over the lower court in question. Sometimes, […]
The post The Writ of Mandamus: What It Is And Why Parties Sometimes Get One appeared first on Dallas Probate Attorneys.
There are four types of disclaimers. The first type is for when an individual who received a gift or bequest disclaims all rights to the gift, thereby giving up their interest in the property and allowing the property to pass as if he or she never received it. The second type is for when an individual who was named as a beneficiary of a trust disclaims any future interest in the property. This prevents them from receiving any more benefits. The third type is for when an individual who has a power of appointment disclaims his or her right to give away part or all of that power to someone else. And finally, the fourth type of disclaimer is when someone partially disclaims their interest in a decedent’s estate, whether through probate or not.
While individuals may disclaim property to avoid certain obligations, as in the case of inheritance. Disclaimers filed in a guardianship proceeding of someone other than the deceased person whom an inheritance is being disclaimed are not considered filings under Texas probate law. The guardianship case of In re Estate of Boren gives us some guidance.
In re Estate of Boren, 268 S.W.3d 841 (Tex. App. – Texarkana 2008, pet. denied)
Sarah E. Boren (Decedent) drafted a will that listed her nephew, Richard Finley, as the independent executor of her estate and Jeanetta Finley, his mother, as the alternate/successor. If her husband, Charles Boren, did not survive her, the will instructed that the estate be divided equally between Richard and Jeanetta.
Richard had previously served as an attorney-in-fact for both Sarah and Charles, neither of which had children. After Charles was appointed a guardian, Richard’s power-of-attorney authority for Charles was revoked by the letters issuing the guardianship. Richard retained Sarah’s power of attorney authority, and originally voiced his disapproval regarding Charles’s guardian’s application to sell his real estate, but later expressed regrets regarding the familial conflict after Charles passed away. Both Charles’s brother and niece testified to Richard’s statements, and the niece had her attorney draft documents that would waive his and Jeanetta’s claims to the estate at hand.
Richard and Jeanetta both signed the waivers, but eight days after the disclaimers were filed in the guardianship, they filed revocations of the waivers and Sarah passed away. Richard applied for probate (for Sarah’s estate), and the trial court denied both the will and his appointment as independent executor. As a part of this ruling, the trial court also articulated that Richard and Jeanetta had foregone any claim to Sarah’s inheritance by signing documents that met the requirements under Texas Probate Code, Section 37A. These documents included a Waiver of Service, Waiver of Interest, and Approval and Consent to Sale of Real Property regarding Sarah’s estate.
Richard then appealed, stating several points of error that then were rejected by the Court of Appeals. The Court stated that the trial court had found Richard “unsuitable” for the role of independent executor under the authority granted by Section 78(e) of the Texas Probate Code, and that as such, it would review the trial court’s ruling under an abuse of discretion standard of review (meaning it was not limited to reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence provided). The Court stated there was evidence supporting the trial court’s determination that Richard was unsuitable for the independent executor role, and that it was not an abuse of discretion. However, it stated that the waivers were not irrevocable under Section 37(A) of the Texas Probate Code because Richard and Jeanetta had properly revoked them before they had been properly filed. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s implied order (that the waiver barred Richard from Sarah’s inheritance) and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
When does a waiver become irrevocable?
Once the proper filing and service requirements are met, the waiver becomes irrevocable. If waivers are revoked prior to their proper filing, they are inoperative despite any intentions to disclaim inheritances (such as express statements).
Disclaimers filed in a guardianship proceeding of someone other than the deceased person whom an inheritance is being disclaimed are not considered filings under Texas probate law.
Do you need help with a guardianship or probate matter in Austin-metro area or the surrounding communities? We are experienced probate attorneys who represent clients with sensitive probate matters. If so, please give us a call us at 512-273-7444 or use the contact form to the right (–>) to see how we can help.
There are a few different ways to become a legal guardian in Texas. The most common way is to be appointed by a judge in a guardianship proceeding. Other ways include being appointed by will or deed, or being elected by a group of people who are legally authorized to do so. Becoming a legal guardian in Texas is a serious responsibility. As a guardian, you will be responsible for making decisions on behalf of another person, known as the ward. These decisions can range from everyday choices like what to wear and what to eat, to more important choices like medical treatment and financial matters.
If you are considering becoming a legal guardian in Texas, it is important that you understand the duties and responsibilities that come with the role. You should also be aware of the different types of guardianship and how they work.
If you are seeking guardianship of a child in Texas, there are some important things to know.
First, Texas law requires that the person seeking guardianship must file a petition with the court. The petition must be signed by the person seeking guardianship and must state the reasons why the person is seeking guardianship.
Second, a hearing will be held on the petition. The court will consider the best interests of the child when making its decision. The court may appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL) to represent the child’s best interests.
Third, if the court grants guardianship, the guardian will have certain rights and responsibilities regarding the child. The guardian will have the right to make decisions about the child’s education, medical care, and other important matters. Additionally, the guardian will be responsible for providing for the child’s physical and emotional needs. fourth, if you are granted guardianship, you will be required to file periodic reports with the court regarding the child’s welfare. Additionally, you may be required to attend training sessions on how to be a good guardian. fifth, if at any time you no longer wish to serve as a guardian, you can resign by filing a notice with the court.
A guardianship in Texas has a few different powers. First and foremost, a guardian has the power to make decisions about the ward’s medical care. This includes the power to consent to or refuse medical treatment, as well as the power to access the ward’s medical records. Additionally, a guardian has the power to make decisions about the ward’s education and residence. Lastly, a guardian has the power to manage the ward’s finances and property.
If you are wondering how to file for legal guardianship of a minor in Texas, there is no need to worry. The process is actually quite simple, and there is a form that you can use.
First, you will need to gather some information about the child and the parents. This includes the child’s full name, date of birth, and Social Security number. You will also need the names and contact information for the child’s parents.
Next, you will need to fill out the legal guardianship form. This form can be found online or at your local courthouse. Once you have completed the form, you will need to sign it in front of a notary public.
Once the form is signed, you will need to file it with the court. The court will then review the form and has the power to make a determination on whether or not to grant guardianship. If guardianship is granted, you will be responsible for making all decisions regarding the child’s welfare, including education and medical care.
The post Texas Disclaimers in Guardianship Proceedings appeared first on Austin Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.
You may be surprised to learn that if a will cannot be located, it may still be possible to probate the estate. To do so, you’ll need to follow the proper legal procedures and file the right paperwork with the court. This article will guide you through the process of probating a lost will. What […]
The post How Do You Probate a Lost Will? appeared first on Dallas Probate Attorneys.
If you’re considering making an online will, you might be wondering if it’s actually legal. The short answer is yes, an online will is just as valid as a handwritten one – as long as it meets all the requirements of a regular will. Keep reading to learn more about what makes a will valid, […]
The post Is an Online Will Valid? appeared first on San Antonio Probate Attorney, Kreig LLC.