Duties and responsibilities to will beneficiaries under Texas estate law You may be honored to take on the responsibility of being the executor of your loved one’s will, or you may not want to deal with it. However, you do have a choice – despite how you feel, you are able to say no and […]
The post Should You Agree to Be a Texas Executor? appeared first on El Paso Probate Attorneys, Kreig LLC.
If a person becomes unable to take care of their financials, as the elderly population does, people may need to step in. That is where adult children come into play. An adult child may decide to help but abuse the disability. Don’t be afraid to call lawyers if you feel like your parent is being […]
The post Is Your Sister or Brother Taking Advantage of Mom’s Estate? appeared first on El Paso Probate Attorneys, Kreig LLC.
After a loved one passes away, their last will and testament becomes a legal document that must be followed in order for their final wishes to be granted. However, there are certain circumstances in which a will can be modified or reformed. In this article, we’ll take a look at when a will can be modified or reformed under Texas probate law.
A will is a legal document that outlines an individual’s wishes for how their property and assets should be distributed after their death. In Texas, a will must be in writing, signed by the testator (the person making the will), and witnessed by two other people in order to be valid.
A will can be modified or reformed under Texas probate law if the testator later decides that they want to change their original instructions. For example, if the testator gets married or has children after making their will, they may want to update their will to reflect these new family members.
If you need to modify your will, it’s important to work with an experienced attorney who can help you navigate the legal process and ensure that your wishes are carried out.
In order for a will to be valid in Texas, it must be in writing, signed by the testator (the person who created the will), and witnessed by two disinterested people. A will does not have to be notarized, but it can be. If you have any questions about whether your will is valid, you should consult with an experienced probate attorney.
In Texas, a will can be modified or reformed if the testator (the person who made the will) meets certain requirements. For example, the testator must be of sound mind and body, and must have made the changes to the will in writing. Additionally, the changes to the will must be signed by two witnesses. If these requirements are met, then a court may modify or reform the will according to the testator’s wishes.
In Texas, a will can be modified or reformed under certain circumstances, depending on the situation. Under Texas Probate Law, if a will is later found to be invalid because of a legal mistake or because of undue influence, the court can reform (fix) it.
As with many legal issues, there are exceptions to every rule. For example, a writing may not be reformed (or fixed) if a later writing that revokes it was made by the testator or testatrix wholly independently of the revoked writing. Also, if an original of the revocation is not in existence or cannot be found, then the revocation cannot be proven and therefore no action can be taken to reform the will.
A court can reform another document known as a codicil if it was revoked by mistake or if it was revoked due to undue influence.
If a will is later found to be invalid because of a legal mistake or because of undue influence, the court can reform (fix) it. This means that the court can change the terms of the will to make them valid. However, there are some circumstances in which a will cannot be reformed. For example, if a later writing exists that revokes the will, then the will cannot be reformed. Additionally, if an original of the revocation is not in existence or cannot be found, then the revocation cannot be proven and therefore no action can be taken to reform the will.
In Texas, a will can be modified or reformed if the testator (the person who made the will) meets certain requirements. A will can be reformed if the testator meets certain requirements. These requirements include: having the capacity to make a will, making the will voluntarily, and not being under duress or undue influence when making the will. If a court finds that a will was made under duress or undue influence, it can reform the will to reflect the testator’s true wishes.
If a court reforms a will, it may also need to modify other provisions in the will, such as who is named as executor or beneficiary. This is because changing one provision in the will can sometimes have unforeseen consequences for other parts of the document. For example, if someone is removed as a beneficiary, that person may also need to be removed as executor. Otherwise, that person would have control over distributing your assets after you die – which may not be what you wanted.
It’s important to note that courts cannot simply change a wills to suit their own preferences; they must adhere to the testator’s true wishes (as expressed in prior documents or through witnesses). Courts also cannot add provisions to a will that the testator did not originally include. So if you want to make sure your Will accurately reflects your wishes, it’s best to consult with an attorney before making any changes.
If you’re thinking of modifying or reforming your will, you may want to speak with an experienced probate attorney who can walk you through the requirements and ensure that your wishes are carried out. If you’re in the process of hiring a probate attorney, it’s important that you make sure they are qualified to handle your case. Call us for a FREE attorney consultation at 915-292-4400.
While no attorney can resolve family conflict over an inheritance, there are some steps you can take to make the process easier.
Inheritances are about family and family is about love. However, when a loved one dies, emotions run high. While you may want the division of the estate to go smoothly, emotions often override reason and cause conflict. Don’t let your emotions get in the way of what’s best for your loved ones. here are a few ways that you can help keep emotions in check during the probate process:
Make sure everyone knows what to expect. Explain to your family that the process will take time and guide them through the stages of probate and distribution of assets. Remember that this is a legal process. While you might be able to have a say in the distribution, it’s up to the court to decide who should receive what.
If you’re expecting a large inheritance, you may be wondering how to protect your assets. Here are a few steps you can take:
I often get asked if a will is good enough to settle an estate. The short answer is yes, but that’s only because the longer answer is too long. It’s better to have a will than not have one, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you have a good will. An estate planning attorney can help you make sure your will does what you intend it to do.
If you have specific wishes for your estate, a will is the best way to ensure that those wishes are carried out. Without a will, your estate will be subject to the laws of intestate succession, which may not distribute your assets in the way you would like. An attorney can help you create a will that reflects your unique circumstances and ensures that your wishes are carried out.
A will can also help to avoid conflict among your heirs. If there is no clear plan for how your assets should be divided, family members may fought over who gets what. A well-crafted will can minimize the potential for disputes by spelling out exactly how you want your assets to be divided. An attorney can help you draft a clear and concise will that leaves no room for interpretation.
Finally, a good will can save your loved ones time and money. The probate process can be long and expensive, but if all of your assets are properly distributed through a will, probate may not be necessary at all. An experienced estate planning attorney can help you navigate the probate process and make sure that your loved ones are taken care of after you’re gone.
If you were named in a will and your sibling is contesting the will and refuses to sign probate, you too may have difficulty accessing your share of the Texas decedent’s estate.
The good news is that there are ways to handle this. The first thing you should do is hire an attorney that can help you through the process of having the rest of the estate distributed. If your sibling refuses to sign off on the court documents that finalize the estate, there are other ways to distribute your share. However, this isn’t as simple as just giving it to you. You won’t be able to just transfer money into your bank account. This will force you to deal with all of the consequences of being an “absconding beneficiary.”
In order to get your share of the estate, you may have to go through a bit more work than if your sibling had just signed off on the documents. However, it is still possible for you to receive what is rightfully yours. The first thing you should do is hire an attorney that can help guide you through the process and ensure that all of the paperwork is in order. If your sibling refuses to sign the necessary documents, there are other ways to distribute the assets, though it will be more complicated than simply transferring money into your bank account. You may become an “absconding beneficiary,” but with the help of a lawyer, you can still receive what is yours.
The answer to the question is pretty easy.
In Texas, you need to publish a notice in a local newspaper offering the chance to contest the will. The timeline of the legal proceeding is usually 60 days after the publication day. If your case passes this round, it will proceed to the court session where a judge will decide whether your case is legitimate and valid or not. If a person challenges the will, he still can have his own will proved in open court and as a result become the personal representative of the deceased.
We help people through estate probate process on every step of their way from preparing the most acceptable final document, to advertising it and then representing your case in court against possible challenges from third parties. Probate legal services vary in relation to complexity and complexity of cases. Contact our Texas lawyers for more information about our probate-specific services.
This question is one of the most common questions asked of us by estate planning attorneys and probate attorneys. Certainly, it is a question that every person should know how to find out the answer to, especially if they have been named in a will. Will changing happens all the time.
The first step in determining whether or not someone has changed their will is to get a copy of the will. If you know where the original is being held, request a copy. Although most people have a copy of their own will, you won’t know if someone else has changed it until you see it.
If you don’t have a copy of your own will and the person who created it won’t give you a copy, you can try to contact the person who holds it (who may be different than the person who created it). This can often be done by searching online public records databases or contacting local government offices in charge of wills and estates. Once you have obtained a copy of the will, review it carefully to look for any changes that may have been made.
The post When Can a Will be Modified or Reformed under Texas Probate Law? appeared first on El Paso Probate Attorneys, Kreig LLC.
If you have a claim against the estate of a deceased person—for example, for unpaid wages or breach of contract or other claim against the estate—you may be wondering what to do. The process for making a claim against an estate depends on whether the estate is being administered through probate or not. The case of Dunn v. Sublett gives us some insight into one aspect of this situation.
Consisting of three parts.
Debts that are pending (not yet matured), rather than debts dependent on a scenario which will never occur.
Dunn v. Sublett, 539 S.W.2d 351 (Tex. 1976)
Michael C. Dunn (Plaintiff), heir to John R. Dunn, deceased, brought forth a claim against the estate of Philip A. Sublett, deceased, which was subsequently rejected by F.B. Sublett (Defendant). Plaintiff’s claim against the estate focused on a tripartite contract between John R. Dunn, Philip Sublett, and Sam Houston. Under this contract, Sublett and Houston sold ownership of land specified within the contract to Dunn, and Dunn advanced a sum of money to them that was required to be reimbursed.
The Supreme Court held that, (1) since the rejection of the claim by the administrator was not based on the lack of authentication by the person providing the affidavit and (2) the statute did not specify who could provide the affidavit, the judgment dismissing the claim must be reversed and remanded.
The Court stated that the claim for money presented by Plaintiff was one that should be presented before the administrator, and that its allowance would simply ensure that the claim had the status that the administrator and chief justice would have given it through its approval (including the general and special liabilities on the estate as allowed by law). An affidavit must be provided with a claim, but the statute does not specify who must provide it, and as such is not conclusive or binding on the administrator. The administrator may reject a claim brought forth by a person lacking competent authority, a proper affidavit, and awareness of the facts, but must state that rationale. If the administrator generally rejects the claim, it will be presumed to be due to the merits of the claim and not for a lack of authentication (unless the claim fails to provide items required by law).
Every claim for money against a testator or intestate needs to be presented to the administrator, regardless of whether the money is currently or not currently due. Debts owed to the United States maintain priority over other debts owed by a deceased person despite the timeline in which debts are required to be paid (whether presently or in the future).
Where a claim against an estate is validated by a person who is neither the owner or the agent of the owner, an administrator that chooses to reject the claim must specifically state why prior to being sued for the establishment of such a claim.
If you have been named the executor of an estate in El Paso, you may be wondering if you need to hire a probate attorney. The answer is: it depends. The probate process can be complex, and if the estate is large or there are potential disputes among the heirs, or the payment of a claim, it may be wise to seek legal help. An experienced probate attorney can help you navigate the process, from filing the necessary paperwork to distributing the assets. If the estate is small and there are no disagreements among the heirs, you may be able to handle the probate process on your own. However, even in these cases, it is always a good idea to consult with an attorney to make sure you are taking the right steps.
If you are unsure whether or not you need to hire a probate attorney, please contact us for a free consultation at (915) 292-4400, or use the calendar to the right (—>). We can help you understand the process and decide if hiring an attorney is right for you.
In order to make a claim on an estate, you will need to provide the following information: the decedent’s full name, date of death, your relationship to the decedent, and your contact information. You will also need to provide a copy of the death certificate. If you are the executor of the estate or administrator of the estate, you will need to provide a copy of the will.
If you’re an heir or a beneficiary of a will, you may be eligible for unclaimed funds if the deceased person has died and it’s been two years since their death. You can claim these funds by filing a claim with the state where the deceased person has passed away. Be sure to check if the property is actually unclaimed before doing so. There are many different types of unclaimed property, so it’s important to know what you’re looking for. Common types of unclaimed property include bank accounts, stocks, bonds, and life insurance policies. If you think you may be entitled to any of this type of property of the estate, reach out to the state in which the deceased person resided and file a claim.
When a claim is filed against an estate, the executor of the estate is responsible for handling the claim. The executor will review the claim and determine if it is valid. If the claim is valid, the executor will pay the claim. If the claim is not valid, the executor will deny the claim.
Generally, an estate includes all real and personal property owned by an individual at the time of their death. However, there are certain types of property that may not be included in the estate, such as jointly owned property, life insurance policies, and retirement accounts.
The post Claims Against a Deceased Person’s Estate appeared first on El Paso Probate Attorneys, Kreig LLC.
A non obstante veredicto (JNOV) means a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. It is a judgment made during litigation that goes against what the jury decides. It happens when a jury decides in favor of one party and the judge sets that verdict aside and decides a ruling in favor of the other party. For example, in a probate proceeding if the jury rules in favor of the person bringing charges (plaintiff), a non obstante veredicto would occur if the judge ignored the jury’s ruling and found in favor of the person the charges were being brought against (defendant). A non obstante veredicto can only under a certain circumstance. What is that circumstance and how is it applicable? Estate of Querner answers these questions.
Estate of Querner, 974 S.W.2d 159 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, no writ)
Thera Querner and her brother Jimmie L. Querner Jr. each owned an undivided 50 percent interest in a 900-acre ranch in Kerr and Gillespie counties which they inherited from their father. The pair sought partition of the ranch meaning they wished to have the property divided between the two of them in accordance with each of their 50 percent interest. Three commissioners oversaw dividing the land equally. Because Thera lived on a house on the ranch her property was more valuable and therefore, the commissioners also oversaw proper allowances to be made to Jimmie for any differences in quality and features of the two parcels of land.
When the land was divided, it was appraised to be worth $1,100 an acre, and 475 acres were given to Jimmie while 425 acres were given to Thera. Thera’s land was valued at $25,000, and Jimmie’s land was valued at $30,000 with adjustments for allowances and taking into consideration that his land had access to the roads through an easement (via use of his sister’s land). Thera disliked these results and filed objections in court. During the trial, the jury was asked if the land had been divided in a fair, just and impartial manner. They answered no. Jimmie then made a motion for JNOV which the court granted. Thera appealed saying the court erred in granting this motion. On appeal, the motion for JNOV was reversed as the court of appeals found the trial court had erred in granting it to overturn the jury trial.
A judgment non obstante veredicto (JNOV) can only occur if there is no evidence to support the decision of the jury. In other words, if jurors have come to a conclusion that cannot be supported by any evidence, the judge may rule against the jury’s verdict. This means that when a party requests for an N.O.V., the reviewing court must decide if there is any evidence for which the jury could have based their ruling off. The review is done with a favorable light to the verdict of the jurors. This means that the reviewing court need only find a scintilla of competent evidence to support the findings in a jury trial. In other words, the reviewing court only needs to find a very small amount of evidence that could support the jury’s original verdict as a matter of law.
Here, it was found that Thera produced enough competent evidence to appeal the JNOV. The testimonies at the trial found that whatever improvements Thera made to her portion of land were too small of magnitude and of such fair/poor condition that the value of them was included in the value of the land. In other words, Thera’s improvements to the land were not large enough to add value to her portion of the land. The commissioners had also testified that the fact that Jimmie is further from the roads and must cross his sister’s land to access them does not add value to his land, and it is actually a detriment to his land’s value. Because the court of appeals was able to find this evidence, they ruled that the trial court made a mistake when they granted Jimmie’s JNOV and overturned the juror’s decision.
Have you lost a loved one and have no idea how to proceed? Our local Texas attorneys can help you through the probate process. A good probate attorney will guide you through every step of the process from beginning to end. Hire an experienced probate lawyer in the El Paso metro area or in the surrounding communities. Contact us on our homepage, and don’t forget to ask about our Free 30-minute probate attorney consultation. You can schedule your free consultation using the calendar on the right ->. From first steps to final distribution, we handle the entire probate process for you.
Judges are permitted to overrule the verdict of a jury if it goes against Texas probate law or if it would be considered unjust. And yes, this does happen, but whether you’re a plaintiff or defendant, don’t count on it as part of your litigation strategy.
There are certain circumstances in which a judge can overrule a jury verdict. As previously mentioned, this happens when the verdict goes against Texas probate law or is considered unjust by the court. In most cases, defendants in probate proceedings believe they have been wrongfully accused by the plaintiff and will attempt to appeal their case; however, there are instances in which plaintiff’s believe they have been wrongfully accused and appeal their case as well.
Is it possible for a judge to overrule a jury’s decision in a criminal case and send the defendant to prison anyway? It can happen, but it’s rare. Let’s say the jury in a criminal case has listened to the evidence, heard witnesses and arguments from both sides, and makes its judgment. It returns a not guilty verdict. A judge can then decide that the trial is not over. If a judge dismisses the jury, he or she can hold a hearing and decide that a defendant is guilty after all.
There are a number of reasons why a judge might choose to do this. In some cases, the judge may feel that there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to support the jury’s verdict. In other cases, the judge may believe that the jury did not correctly apply the law when reaching their decision.
Whatever the reason, if a judge does choose to overrule a jury’s acquittal, the defendant will usually have an opportunity to appeal the decision. This means that they can take their case to a higher court where it will be reviewed by a panel of judges. If they are still found guilty by this higher court, then they will likely be required to serve their sentence. But again, don’t rely on this as a defense strategy.
In a criminal case, if the jury is unable to agree on a verdict and a deadlock is reached, the judge would declare it a mistrial. When a jury deadlocks, or is unable to come to a decision on a verdict, the judge presiding over the case declares a mistrial. This means that the trial is ended and no verdict is reached. The jury’s inability to come to a decision does not necessarily mean that they believe the defendant is innocent, but rather that they are unable to agree beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. If the prosecution and defense are both unsatisfied with the outcome of a mistrial, they may choose to retry the case.
Trial outcomes are the ultimate decision from a jury or a judge, who hears the facts of a case. This can be a financial award, an order, or a denial. While trial outcomes are sometimes thought of as final decisions, they often prompt an appeal.
The post Can a Probate Judge Overturn a Jury Verdict? appeared first on El Paso Probate Attorneys, Kreig LLC.